Choosing a repository hosting service is a big decision. How you host your code is an important part of your work and affects your productivity. So you’ll want to make sure you choose the platform that’s most conducive to your (and your team’s) specific needs and goals.
From Bitbucket, choose Personal settings from your avatar in the lower left. The Account settings page opens. If you've already added keys, you'll see them on this page. Select your account from your Accounts tab in Sourcetree. Click the Copy to Clipboard button to copy your public SSH key. From Bitbucket, click Add key. Bitbucket Pipelines with Deployments lets you build, test and deploy with integrated CI/CD. Benefit from configuration as code and fast feedback loops. Secure your workflow. Know your code is secure in the Cloud with IP whitelisting and required 2-step verification. Restrict access to certain users, and control their. Github offers Windows and Mac native clients which are great. If you use Github for your. For those users not comfortable with the command line and even those who are I would suggest using Sourcetreeapp.com (free Git & Mercurial client for Mac and Windows) with Bitbucket.org (free unlimited web private code repositories) which I have been testing out over the last quarter and all works great with the added benefit of a lot less.
If you’re like most developers, you’re probably using Git as your Version Control System (VCS). However, deciding where to host the source code can be challenging. Two of the most popular options are Bitbucket and GitHub, but how do you decide which one is right for you?
In this post, we’ll discuss the importance of choosing the right code repository. Then we’ll look at Bitbucket vs GitHub to see how the two compare.
Let’s get started!
Why Choosing the Right Code Repository System Is Important for Developers
Your repository hosting service is the third-party application that enhances your VCS (which in most cases is Git). The code repository you use can play a pivotal role in your development workflow.
For example, it influences your ability to collaborate with other members on your team, and the efficiency of that process. It also affects how you measure, monitor, and manage your projects. Each code repository system comes with its pros and cons. There are a handful of important considerations to take into account when comparing them, including:
- VCS support
- Collaborator access
- Interface and usability
- Extensions and third-party integrations
- Pricing plans
Another major factor to think about is whether you’re looking for a public or a private repository. Certain platforms are better suited for one use case or the other, so it’s important to know upfront what you’re going to need.
Among the two most popular choices for source code repositories are Bitbucket and GitHub. While they are similar in many ways, there are some key differences worth considering before deciding which option is best for your development project needs.
An Introduction to Bitbucket and GitHub
Bitbucket and GitHub are hosting platforms that provide both public and private repositories for developers. In terms of functionality, Bitbucket and GitHub operate in very similar ways. With both, you can perform basic commands such as:
- Creating and managing repositories
- Logging in using Two-Factor Authentication (2FA)
- Making pull requests
- Using inline editing and Markdown support
- Performing issue tracking
However, in order to truly understand both platforms, it’s necessary to take a closer look at what each brings to the table.
Bitbucket Overview
Bitbucket is a version control repository hosting service, which was created in 2008 and is owned by Atlassian. This Git repository management solution is written in Python, and built using the Django web framework:
One of the main draws of Bitbucket is that it offers built-in flexibility in terms of VCS support. It also provides unlimited private code repositories for Mercurial and Git.
Additional Bitbucket features include:
- Direct integration with Jira, Bamboo, Crucible, and Jenkins
- The ability to import repos from Git, Codeplex, GoogleCode, and SVN
- External authentication support for GitHub, Google, Facebook, and Twitter
- Heavy integration with Trello
- A Mac and Windows client (Sourcetree) and an Android app (Bitbeaker)
While you can use Bitbucket to host open source repositories, it’s primarily geared towards enterprises and businesses that are developing private, proprietary code. Another unique benefit of Bitbucket is that it offers a secure platform for your code with Soc 2 Type 2 certification.
GitHub Overview
GitHub is arguably the most popular development platform, offering one of the largest coding communities out there. With more than 40 million users and 100 million repositories worldwide, it’s widely deemed the hub for Git version control, and is the largest host of source code on the planet:
The GitHub website home page
GitHub is an open source repository hosting service, which was started in 2004 and acquired by Microsoft in 2018. It’s written in Ruby and Erlang, and its primary focus is on public code. You can use it to host and review code, build software, and manage your development projects.
We grew our traffic 1,187% with WordPress.
We’ll show you how.
Join 20,000+ others who get our weekly newsletter with insider WordPress tips!
GitHub’s features include:
- GitHub Pages and GitHub Gist
- Support for Git and SVN (partially)
- Direct integration with Zendesk, Azure, Cloudbees, Google Cloud, Amazon, Code Climate, and Heroku
- Support for over 200 programming languages
- GitHub desktop clients for Mac and Windows
You can use GitHub for both your personal and business development projects. One of the biggest draws of GitHub is that it’s free for unlimited public repositories.
Bitbucket vs GitHub: Key Differences
The biggest difference between Bitbucket vs GitHub is that the former is used primarily for private repositories, while the latter is the go-to option for public repositories. This doesn’t mean you can’t use GitHub for private repositories and vice versa, just that those are the two platforms’ specialties.
There are also some minor differences worth noting. For example, GitHub offers a desktop client and SVN support. Bitbucket does not, although it does provide Mercurial support. Let’s take a look at how the two platforms compare on a few other important factors.
Extensions and Third-Party Integrations
From issue tracking to project management tools, there are a variety of extensions and apps that can help extend the functionality and usefulness of your repository hosting platform. Both Bitbucket and GitHub come with a plethora of extensions and third-party integrations for you to choose from.
From a quantitative standpoint, Bitbucket has a leg up over GitHub in terms of third-party integrations. This is due to the Atlassian Marketplace, which has approximately 2,300 apps that can be used both for Bitbucket and the Atlassian sister products. It also has cross-product compatibility, which can be particularly useful for enterprise developers:
The Atlassian Marketplace website
However, the GitHub Marketplace also offers plenty of apps and ‘GitHub Actions’ that help you extend the functionality and automation of your development workflow:
These tools can help with project management, monitoring, code quality, and more. Most of the 92+ integrations available with GitHub are GitHub-exclusive.
User Interface
When it comes to deciding between Bitbucket vs GitHub, another factor that might be important is their User Interfaces (UIs). After all, you want to make sure the platform you choose for managing your projects is easy to use and navigate.
Bitbucket has an incredibly clean and organized interface:
The Bitbucket dashboard
It’s simple to move around the dashboard and find what you’re looking for. Plus, the clear sidebar navigation makes finding what you need very straightforward.
As for GitHub, it doesn’t have an overly complex interface. However, it does tend to be a bit more cluttered and confusing than Bitbucket’s UI:
It can be a bit more challenging to navigate and use this dashboard, especially if you’re not familiar with it. However, while it might not be the most stylish UI, it isn’t lacking in features or utility.
Wikis and Boards
Another difference that’s worth noting when comparing Bitbucket vs GitHub relates to wiki functionality. Having a wiki is incredibly useful when it comes to collaborating and communicating with other team members and developers on your projects.
With Bitbucket, you can enable a wiki for each of your repositories, and choose whether to make them public or private:
The wiki settings page in Bitbucket
Unfortunately, unlike with Bitbucket, free private repositories on GitHub can’t have their own wikis. Only the free public repositories can.
Conversely, GitHub comes with a Projects tab by default, while Bitbucket does not. However, you can link your Bitbucket repository directly to Trello, which serves a similar function.
Need a blazing-fast, secure, and developer-friendly hosting for your client sites? Kinsta is built with WordPress developers in mind and provides plenty of tools and a powerful dashboard. Check out our plans
In GitHub, the Projects tab includes a built-in Kanban solution:
This means that each project has its own board. Although those boards don’t have as many features as Trello, they’re sufficient for many planning and documentation purposes.
Branch Permissions
Both Bitbucket and GitHub enable you to grant users access to specific branches.
Let’s say you don’t want a team member or collaborator to have full access to your repository. Instead, you can configure the permissions to restrict their access to only an individual branch.
One of the advantages of using Bitbucket over GitHub is that it includes this functionality for free on every plan. With GitHub, although you can enable branch restrictions for free on public repositories, you can only enforce them on private repositories with a paid plan.
Support and Community
Bitbucket is geared largely towards businesses and enterprises. As such, the majority of its users rely on it for private repositories. On the other hand, GitHub is the largest host for public code, and in turn, has a huge open source community.
From a sheer numerical standpoint, there’s a bigger community involvement to tap into with GitHub than there is with Bitbucket. If your goal is to reach as many developers as possible, GitHub is probably the better option.
This isn’t to say there isn’t any support or community base for Bitbucket, however. In addition to a large user base, Bitbucket also offers online support, including webinars, tutorials, and an extensive collection of documentation.
Pricing Structures
Since both Bitbucket and GitHub offer private and public repositories, your decision may be largely informed by pricing and more specifically what you get for that cost. Of course, your needs and resources will differ based on whether you’re an enterprise company, a freelancer, or a small team.
Let’s start with Bitbucket’s pricing. On its free cloud hosting plan, you can create unlimited private and public repositories with up to five users. This includes 1 GB of Git large file storage (LFS) for storing large non-text files. After that, rates increase by $3 per user per month:
Bitbucket’s pricing plans
For its self-managed hosting, Bitbucket offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users you have with some discounts. If you’re looking for enterprise-level hosting at a Bitbucket datacenter, prices start at $1,980 for 25 users.
GitHub is free to use to create unlimited public and private repositories, with no limit to the number of users you can have. The free plan also includes 500 MB of storage.
Paid plans start at $4 per month. That includes unlimited collaborators, unlimited public and private repositories, more storage, reminders, wikis and pages for private repositories, just to name a few. If you want an Enterprise plan, those begin at $21 per user per month:
GitHub’s enterprise-level pricing — called GitHub One — isn’t’ publicity available and requires you to get in touch with sales. Also, GitHub doesn’t offer the self-managed hosting option that Bitbucket does through its data centers.
Summary
Choosing the right platform to host your source code between Bitbucket vs GitHub can be tricky. However, taking a close look at these popular and established repository hosts is a great place to start.
As we’ve seen, both Bitbucket and GitHub have unique advantages that make them well-suited to certain types of development teams:
- GitHub is a powerful open source platform that is well-equipped to handle personal or small team projects that you’re comfortable sharing with the public.
- Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution if you’re an enterprise or business looking for a safe hosting service for your private, proprietary code.
Now, it’s your turn: what’s your take on the Bitbucket vs GitHub challenge? Let us know in the comments section below!
If you enjoyed this article, then you’ll love Kinsta’s WordPress hosting platform. Turbocharge your website and get 24/7 support from our veteran WordPress team. Our Google Cloud powered infrastructure focuses on auto-scaling, performance, and security. Let us show you the Kinsta difference! Check out our plans
Original text: https://www.toutiao.com/i6829…
While many users can easily use git from the command line, there are a variety of GUI clients that can greatly speed up your workflow, especially if you are not familiar with the platform.
If you’re looking for the ideal client to manage the repository on your Mac, this article lists the best GUI git clients for Mac OS X or windows.
https://desktop.github.com/
GitHub desktop is a completely free, open source, electron based git client application developed by GitHub. It allows you to interact with GitHub and other git platforms (including bitbucket and gitlab).
Its features include a nice partitioning method, which makes it easy to check branches with pull requests, you can check the differences between images and code blocks, and you can even use drag and drop to add items from the application for management.
https://git-fork.com/
Fork is a free advanced GUI git client for Mac and windows, focusing on speed, user friendliness and efficiency. Its functions include topic layout with quick action buttons, built-in merge conflict helper and parser, warehouse manager, GitHub notification, etc.
In the free git client, I like most of fork’s features. The features I know include interactive rebase, GIT streaming, GIT LFS, culling, recovery, submodules, etc.
https://www.git-tower.com/
Tower is a paid GUI git client for MacOS and windows. At present, it is one of the leading client applications in professional git tools. It enables you to perform all git operations visually, and gives you a better understanding of version control. It includes merge conflict ranking and project collaboration.
You can enjoy a free 30 day trial period and then pay $69 per user or $99 per user for a basic or pro subscription, respectively.
https://www.sourcetreeapp.com/
Sourcetree is a free GUI git client for MacOS and windows. It simplifies the version control process, allowing you to focus on what’s important – coding.
It has a professional UI, which can perform git tasks and access git streams by directly accessing git stream, sub module, remote repo manager, local Submit search, support git large file and other visual management version library.
Sourcetree was developed by atlassian for bitbucket, but not limited to this. It can be used in conjunction with other git platforms and has built-in support for the mercurial repository.
https://www.syntevo.com/smart…
Smartgit is a rich git client for Mac, Linux and windows. It supports SVN, GitHub and bitbucket pull request. Its functions include cli for git, graph merge and submit history, SSH client, GIT flow, file merge, conflict resolution program, etc.
Smartgit can be used for non-commercial projects for free. The cost of the license ranges from $99 per year to $229 for life. Fees may vary depending on the period of support you choose.
Bitbucket Gui Client
https://www.sublimemerge.com/
Sublime merge is a git client for Mac, windows and Linux, created by the same developer after the popular sublime text source code editor.
Bitbucket Client Download
It includes all the qualities satisfied by sublime Text users, including fast performance, integrated merge tools, powerful search tools, advanced difference checker, etc. It’s free, but like sublime text, you need to pay $99 for an extension license.
https://www.gitkraken.com/
Gitkraken is a free cross platform GUI git client, which can be used in version control system (including GitHub, bitbucket, gitlab, etc.). It aims to make you a productive git user by providing you with intuitive UI, task tracking, built-in code editor, merge conflict editor, and support for integration with other platforms.
Gitkraken costs $4.08 per month for commercial purposes and other features included in the pro version, such as merging conflict editors, multiple profiles, and self hosting repositories, while the enterprise version costs more.
https://gitup.co/
Gitup is a free and open source git client for Mac users, focusing on speed, simplicity, efficiency and ease of use. It bypasses git binaries and interacts directly with the repository database, which makes it much faster than other git clients. For example, it loads and renders 40000 gitup repository submissions in a second.
Gitup has GUI alternatives for all git functions, and can intuitively implement input commands and real-time changes.
https://github.com/FredrikNor…
Although there are many different versions of GUI on the market, developers may look for a very simple way to use GIT. Yes, if it’s hard for you to choose which GUI is better, ungit will solve your choice.
Ungit brings user friendliness to git without sacrificing its versatility, and it can run on all platforms.
Bitbucket Clients For Mac High Sierra
https://aurees.com/
Aurees git client is a free application for git users on MAC, windows and Linux. It aims to provide you with a simple and powerful application to manage all git projects with GUI, so as to speed up the workflow.
It provides you with the convenience of intuitive operation of GIT warehouse. These features include excellent merge and preview, conflict resolution, built-in editor difference checking, intuitive highlighting, etc.
https://gitahead.github.io/gi…
Gitahead is a graphical git client for all different operating systems. It has a fast native interface designed to help you understand and manage source code history.
Gitahead was developed by understand Gamma Scitools, a manufacturer of Gamma Design. It has all the features it wants to get from commercial quality customers, now completely free and open source.
https://gitblade.com/
Gitblade is a beautiful git client on MAC, windows and Linux platforms. It provides users with the daily functions needed to operate git projects, including merging tools, displaying link branches and submitted visualizations, and joint difference checking to see the differences between multiple added files. It is a responsibility / annotation tool for visualizing file history.
Gitblade has free access to all basic git features, 14 day professional features. The professional edition, which costs $19.99 per user per year, includes licenses for up to three computers, repository tags, unconventional tools, merge tools, etc.
While all of these applications provide similar functionality for git projects, they have unique capabilities that make them stand out in other areas.
If there are any errors or other problems, you are welcome to comment and correct. If you have any help, please click like + forward to share.
Welcome to the official account of the brother of migrant workers:Migrant workers’ technology road